Comments on: US of AIPAC-MIC-Bomb Brownie

By: almostinfamous

almostinfamous — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:35:58 +0000

Gore was a centrist DLC guy, and ran his campaign as such. which is to say, rather poorly. And yet, he won the popular vote and was only ‘robbed’ in the E.C. rather than demand vociferously for reform of the (totally fucked up) electoral college system, it is seen as fit by a surprisingly large number of intelligent people that motherfuckin Nader took it away(a statment which by itself raises more questions than answers) rather than a fucked-up system.

please read the follow up to this post.

By: mdhatter

mdhatter — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:58:21 +0000

agreed.

By: Adorable Girlfriend

Adorable Girlfriend — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:54:23 +0000

It was a good day until I had to read Nader’s name here.

Dear Gawd.

Can we forget about him and what happened with Gore. Just don’t bring him up!!!

PLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZZZZZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

By: mdhatter

mdhatter — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:55:28 +0000

If only presidentin’ were like campaingin’.

She’s a great campaigner. A leader? That I disagree with. No. Too few among us will follow her.

Too few.

By: Adorable Girlfriend

Adorable Girlfriend — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:37:29 +0000

Hillary Clinton has, as she has said, taken this incoming fire for 15 years or more. She’s had her patriotism questioned, her sexuality questioned, been accused of being a murderer, been accused of much more and yet she’s still the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination.

She’s tougher than boot leather while having a human side. Those are assets that our candidate needs. Hillary Clinton has developed thick skin and the ability to remain calm in campaign combat. Yet, she also knows how to listen to the American people.